DON MASHAK'S CHALLENGE TO ALL USA POLITICAL PARTIES!
THIS IS DON MASHAK'S CHALLENGE TO ALL USA POLITICAL PARTIES TO ADOPT PLATFORM PLANKS AND TAKE POSITIONS ON POLITICAL ISSUES CONSISTENT WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPTS OF LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS AS IT APPLIES TO AVERAGE CITIZENS. Libertarian, Democrat, Republican, Communist, Green - What ever they call themselves, there seems to be a few fundamental Party Platform Planks and Political Positions they should be able to agree upon.
Though
he has lost the first round, President Obama has pledged to press the
fight for more gun control. The definitive persuasive arguments
contained herein are written in anticipation of the governments
continued efforts to dismantle the 2nd Amendment. This
article contains 10 irrefutable points against more gun control which
are based in Common Sense, Natural Law, Baser Instincts and
Constitutional Rights.
Before anything else is said, let us
acknowledge the loss of innocent lives as the infuriating tragedy that
it is. Further, let us vigorously express our empathy and sympathy for
the survivors and the loved ones of the victims and pledge to hold the
perpetrators accountable.
That having been said, this writer finds
it first necessary to take the time to summarize 7 historically
accurate points to lay a foundation for common ground, mutual
understanding and feelings of unity among rank and file Americans aka WE
THE PEOPLE. Too often, WE THE PEOPLE are divided on any particular
issue on the basis of political party affiliation.
This writer asserts
that WE THE PEOPLE can establish a foundation of common ground, mutual
understanding and unity by making ourselves aware of the history of
Tyranny and Natural Law on this planet.
“Knowledge
will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own
governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” James Madison
Every
American should use the information and concepts contained within these
7 historical points to assess not only the gun control issue, but every
political issue that comes before them. Within the parameters of these 7
points, every single rank and file American will find they are less
vulnerable to being manipulated against their own best interests by the
“Powers that Be”. By adhering to the perspective of the world outlined
herein, WE THE PEOPLE will find the greatest common ground, mutual
understanding and unity. In so doing, WE THE PEOPLE can stop being
divided and conquered by those who seek to manage and manipulate us like
livestock for their own personal gain.
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please
join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens
our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of
restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our
Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration
of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
As this writer's regular readers are aware, this writer has pressed for Fiscal TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) since the Summer of 2009. Wright County Minnesota refused to adequately respond to this writer's request for County financial information. Said information is supposed to be a matter of public record. This request was prompted by large Property Tax increases in a short few years. The limited and poorly formatted fiscal information the County finally provided was only after prolonged and repeated requests as well as a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) demand. My full requests have yet to be provided. What happened to Government Transparency?
Among the snotty explanations County Apparatchiks provided was they did not have to provide the data in a usable format. This writer's request that Wright County just post their budget, actual revenues and actual expenditures on the internet was met with recalcatrant laughter. The Minnesota State Auditor, Attorney General as well as State and Federal Legislators were unwilling or unable to help.
In response to thus situation, in 2010 and 2012 this writer proposed the following Caucus Resolutions and Legislation in Minnesota:
All Minnesota Municipalities (Counties, Cities, Schools, etc.) are required to post their budgets and actual expenditures and revenues on the internet In terms understandable by the average high school graduate with no aggregates greater than $100.00. That said records shall be maintained on the internet for 10 years and be easily downloadable to fully functioning spreadsheets such as Microsoft Excel June 2011 - Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, Pro-Wresting & the US 2 Party System 2/2 (see Heading "Financial Reform" http://goo.gl/pu38d
I suggested they should post it all on the internet in a format the lay person could understand but that has not happened either.
Jan 2011 - TEA PARTY - Planning the 2nd Enlightenment Part 2b of 3 (see heading, "Rise of Modern Feudalism") I ask each of my fellow citizens to ask all State Senator, Representative and Gubernatorial Candidates to support legislation requiring all municipal governments from this point forward to post and maintain on the internet the last 5 years of their budgets and actual expenditures. I call for this information posted in laymans terms with no aggregated amounts exceeding $100 dollars. October 2010 Fiscal Fantasyland, Fiscal Transparency and a New Vikings Stadium http://goo.gl/L2rs1
You may continue reading the rest of the story for free by clicking here http://t.co/wPt8z2vN3B
Those were my thoughts.
In Closing:
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.
-------- RELATED ARTICLES---------
TEA Party Citizen Activism - Write a letter to your City and County: Where's the money? http://goo.gl/EDYvR
TEA Party Activism! Wright County MN - Massive County Financial Cover up ? http://goo.gl/eos6Y
As this writer’s regular reader’s are aware, we began 2013 with our
proposed apolitical “Political Boot Camp” New Year’s Resolutions. You
can see this January 1st, Article here: “2013 New Year’s Resolutions Provoked by Election 2012” http://t.co/q4p6grZF . A Portion of Exercise two of that Political Boot Camp resolution follows:
Natural Law, Natural Rights, Divine Right of Kings, Consent of the Governed and the Enlightenment.
To help us share a common perspective to evaluate experiences and data
we encounter, we must each study, abide by and evaluate our experiences
in the context of Natural Law.
In what seems to be a
response to these proposed Political Boot Camp Resolutions, this writer
has became aware of various rumblings within the Academic Community.
Last week this writer became aware of this article “Education plan reopens divide on U.S. history” http://t.co/c6ZobtnU
Once
the reader gets past the “America the Ugly” dialogue, you come upon an
attempt to Turn Natural Law into a matter of religion. And anyone who
can see a few moves ahead, can anticipate that this is an attempt is to
prevent Natural Law cannot be taught in the Schools.
The words
“Law of Natural” aka Natural Law and “Unalienable Rights” appear in our
Declaration of Independence. Our Bill of Rights itself is the reduction
to writing of certain Natural Law Rights. In fact, at one point it was
argued that these Certain, Unalienable Natural Law Rights were so
obvious, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights.
That having been said, this writer is hard pressed to understand how our educational system will....
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow
citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual
endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE
as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph,
Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
TellMyPoliticiangoo.gl/1FWfz
Keep Fighting the Good Fight!
In Liberty, Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
twitter.com/dmashak
Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
Let us begin with best wishes to all of my readers in this New Year of 2013.
This writer has purposely not written much regarding politics since this past November 6th, 2012 to gain perspective on the best direction in which this Country should proceed.
After the election,
this writer was very disappointed when he heard the same old rhetoric,
issues and political dogma once again emerge as the dominate manner of
political discourse.
Further, regardless of who they voted for, a large number of voters
were not happy with choices they had to select from for President and
other offices. These choices were forced upon them by the Establishment
of both major parties.
Liberty died a little bit more this year as both major political parties
decided to abandon the Rule of Law and resurrect the political
philosophy known as the Divine Right of Kings.
In the Republican party, we saw the GOP Establishment stack the
rules committee to pass rules that make grassroots participation even
more difficult;
In the Democratic Party, we saw the Democrat Establishment blatantly
lie about the outcome of a vote regarding the mention of God and
Jerusalem in their platform.
These two Un-American acts by both major political parties
demonstrated to Americans of every political stripe that our political
parties no longer represent us but rather manage us like livestock. When
their duplicity fails, they resort to the philosophy of “Might makes
Right”.
With so much money and power aligned against WE THE PEOPLE, it is
difficult to know where to start. But start somewhere we must.
This writer has concluded that WE THE PEOPLE must take on the role in
framing the issues of future elections instead of allowing the 2 major
parties and the press to do so.
Further, WE THE PEOPLE must......
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow
citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual
endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE
as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph,
Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
TellMyPoliticiangoo.gl/1FWfz
Keep Fighting the Good Fight!
In Liberty, Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
twitter.com/dmashak
Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
The
Minnesota Courts have finally committed such an outrageous and
undeniable act of tyranny, that even the most disinterested and
skeptical of Minnesota citizens are forced to acknowledge it as an act
against public policy and the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE. Even
those persons most loyal to the Minnesota Judiciary recognize this act
as creating “case law” that is an unmistakable departure the “Rule of
Law” and every citizen’s Natural Law Right to “Due Process”.
MINNESOTA LAWYERS NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED
TO TREAT THEIR CLIENTS ETHICALLY
In the secret, unpublished, clandestine Appellate Court Ruling of Fabian, et. al v Vollkommer MN A10-1205 (http://goo.gl/da5cy
)the Minnesota District, Appellate and Supreme Courts have ruled that
Minnesota lawyers do not have the legal requirement to treat their
clients ethically. Paraphrasing a portion of the ruling, the Minnesota
District, Appellate and Supreme Court ruled that the “Minnesota Lawyers’
Code of Professional Conduct is not an implied covenant in any legal
services contract between a Minnesota Lawyer and their client”.
Under
the Signature of Chief Justice Gildea, the Minnesota Supreme Court
refused to hear the appeal of ruling that shatters the Rule of Law in
Minnesota and voids every citizen’s Natural Law Right to Due Process.( http://goo.gl/alqA6 ) (Chief Justice Lorie Skjevern Gildea was appointed by Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty in 2006)
For
most citizens, in matters of law it is of paramount importance that
their counsel’s duty to treat them ethically be held inviolate. The
laws have unnecessarily yet deliberately been written in a convoluted
and complex manner that few common citizens can hope to understand., let
alone represent themselves in a court of law. By acts imperceptible to
the average citizen, their own lawyer can determine the outcome of a
case by, for example, failing to put evidence on the official record or
allowing the other party to put evidence on the record that would
appropriately be objected to. These and other “maneuvers” that can
almost invisibly influence the outcome litigation demand that lawyers be
legally bound to treat their clients ethically, lest they be tempted by
bribe, political consideration or pressure of a judge to do otherwise.
Sans
any legitimate reason being provided by the Minnesota Judiciary, can
their be any doubt as to the intent of this A10-1205 ruling. That intent
being to allow lawyers to “legally” collude with judges and other
lawyers to fix the outcome of Court Cases?
This Clandestine Case
Law establishes that the Minnesota Lawyers’ Code of Professional Conduct
is nothing more than false advertising. Unwitting Citizens are...
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please
join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens
our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of
restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our
Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration
of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
As this writer looks out over the political
landscape, he is amazed at how irrelevant the content of commercials and
debates really are.
The debates seem to be scripted and choreographed in a style
fashioned after TV’s Professional Wrestling. Except that Pro Wrestling
is little more than relatively harmless entertainment, while these
presidential debates are supposed to provide facts and substance upon
which American voters can make reasoned voting decisions. Edward Bernays
himself would be proud at the scripted and choreographed manipulation
of Public opinion into which the debates have devolved. http://goo.gl/2bnKo - http://goo.gl/RIEXU - http://goo.gl/wpMnq .
Not satisfied to allow the American Public be manipulated by the one
and only one ruling class pretending to be two political parties, this
writer has compiled his list of Debate Questions
that should be asked, but won’t. This writer energetically requests
his readers to seek answers to these questions from not only the
presidential candidates but from every appropriate elected official
running for a political office that for which they can cast a vote.
Please do not allow the 2 major political parties to define the issues
important for this election. Determine what issues are important for
yourself, and ask question to inform yourself so you can cast your vote
in a manner consistent with your own personal best interests.
DEBATE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER
To begin with, How about we stick to current, pressing issues
& not get distracted by social issues that haven’t been resolved in
50+ yrs
Where do individual citizen’s rights come from?
In your opinion, how much has corruption contributed to the current crisis that America is facing?
On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst, how would you rate the corruption of our Federal
Government?
On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst, how would you rate the corruption of our Federal Judiciary?
Should the anti-Congressional Insider Trading Bill be redrafted and
re-passed to take out the exclusion of wives, children, parents and
siblings from prosecution? In other words, so insider trading applies
to politicians in the same way it applies to the rest of rank and file
America?
Thanks to the many who sent me suggestions of questions to include.
Those were my thoughts.
In Closing:
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow
citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual
endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE
as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph,
Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
Former US Supreme Court Judges says the darnedest things. This writer has stewed on a comment made by former Judge Sandra Day O’Connor at the end of July 2012 and just can no longer keep himself from responding to her tripe.
In the past year, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has
issued 2 or more highly questionable rulings. The first being the
unlimited campaign contributions (aka Corporations are people too) and
the second being Obamacare.
About a month after the infamous Supreme Court Obamacare Ruling
Former US Supreme Court Judge Sandra Day O’Connor asserted in various
snobbish/elitist legal news venues that persons who criticize the
Supreme Court’s rulings just need to be educated. In particular, she
indicated rank and file Americans who question SCOTUS need to be
educated in civics and the role of the judiciary.
The inference being that WE THE PEOPLE are a bunch of uneducated
hicks unable to understand the basis of SCOTUS rulings and fundamental
right and wrong. (These are the least “high brow” reporting of Ms.
O’Connor’s comments that I can find http://goo.gl/e6zpChttp://goo.gl/WXn5F ) Quoting from the first article:
Sandra Day O’Connor Wants You To Be Educated Before You Speak
Sandra Day O’Connor, former Supreme Court Justice,
is tired of all the negative Nancys throwing shade at Chief Justice
John Roberts, whose decision to uphold the health care reform act got a
lot of people talking. After he was called a “traitor” to the court,
O’Connor stepped up in his defense, citing a lack of misinformation as
the reason for the backlash.
“It’s unfortunate because I think comments like that demonstrate
only too well a lack of understanding some of our citizens have about
the role of the judicial branch,” she said…..
Before anything else is said, this writer states he never accused US
Supreme Court Chief Justice John “Humpty Dumpty” Roberts of being a
traitor to the Court. Humpty Dumpty (http://goo.gl/pQFlN
Chapter 6) Roberts is a traitor to the Constitution and the Vision the
Founding Father’s had for this Country. That vision including maximum
individual liberty and maximum individual self-sufficiency. Liberty and
tyranny is a Zero Sum game. Every gain in authority by the government
must necessarily result in the loss of liberty for the individual. All
SCOTUS has done with these recent rulings is reduce the liberty of the
individual.
That having been said, this author must ask, what civics “education” does Ms. O’Connor mean?
Does she mean the propaganda laden indoctrination in civics for
young folks?... with the false representation that the US Judicial
System makes careful decisions using the Rule of Law properly applied to
the freely admitted, relevant facts in evidence? And that, therefore,
the decisions of any Court, but especially the US Supreme Court are
beyond questioning? Or,
Does she mean the carefully guarded secret that
the US Judiciary doesn’t make decisions pursuant to the Rule of Law, but
in reality has reverted to the Divine Right of Kings http://goo.gl/Widfa and will ruthlessly crush any citizen that dares to criticize or expose the corrupt judiciary for what it really is?
Former Supreme Court Justice O’Connor, can you please elaborate on what you mean?
Ms. O’Connor, WE THE PEOPLE are not stupid. Even an uneducated
person can usually deduce for themselves when they are being cheated,
lied to, “handled” and treated with duplicity. The Internet is blowing
the lid off the dirty little secrets of the US Judiciary. WE THE PEOPLE
are campaign notes on our experiences with the US judiciary. At the
moment, most rank and file American’s do not know how corrupt the
judiciary is, and a large portion of those who do, have seen what you do
to the leaders of Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and
Reform) and are afraid to speak up for fear of similar Government
retaliation. This article will more properly inform rank and file
Americans of “What’s going on?”(http://goo.gl/67DTH)
In this article we are going to cover the US Judiciaries corrupt rulings and actions in the following areas:
11th Amendment;
Property Rights and the Divine Right of Kings;
Unlimited Corporate Campaign Contributions
Minnesota and the 1st Amendment Right to Petition
Article 1 Section 8 of the Minnesota Constitution
MN Appellate Court Case A10-1205 MN Lawyers not required to treat clients ethically;
Unconstitutional Reprisal and Punishment of Minnesota Citizens seeking Minnesota Judicial TAR/ FRAP 35/40 Motion
Obamcare
Using the fictional hillbilly characters of Mavis, Amos and
Sandy, this writer will meet and exceed the evidentiary standard of
Clear and Convincing in establishing that SCOTUS and the US Judiciary
have blatantly abandoned the Rule of Law, engaged in Simulated
Litigation and blatantly just ignored the plain meaning of words.
(Suggestion to the reader - Please read the following, imagining
Mavis, Amos and Sandy speaking with a hillbilly drawl while “Dueling
Banjos” [The theme song from......
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow
citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual
endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE
as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph,
Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Psst. Hey buddy, come on over here. Let me hook you up with some good stuff. It’s a controlled substance…. RAW MILK. Don’t tell anyone where you got it.
After 3 days of trial and 4 plus hours of deliberation, a Hennepin County, Minnesotajury found organic egg farmer Alvin Schlangen not guilty of 3 misdemeanors. Those charges being 1) selling unpasteurized milk, 2) operating without a food license and 3) handling adulterated or misbranded food. http://goo.gl/3I1Eq
In this article, we will discuss:
This
writer grew up on a dairy farm, so this issue is of particular interest
to him. Further, this writer’s father owned and operated a bulk milk
route in Wisconsin that brought raw milk from the local dairy farms to
the local Dairy Cooperative, now known as Foremost Farms. And, finally
this writer has been heavily involved in the Judicial TAR (Transparency,
Accountability and Reform) Movement. These experiences provide this
writer with a unique perspective to offer his readers.
This issue really comes down to Big Food trying to protect its
financial interests from smaller food producers and cooperatives.
Through campaign contributions and other consideration, Big Food has
been able to machinate restrictive legislation into place and then cause
the legal system to expand this legislation beyond its original intent.
In so doing, they have “legally” driven out the competition.
It is also in the interest of a tyrant to keep his subjects poor,
so that they may not be able to afford the cost of protecting
themselves by arms and be so occupied with their daily tasks that they
have no time for rebellion.... Subjects are also kept poor by payment of
taxes.
Aristotle, Politics. C.334-23 BC.
In so doing, Big Food Folks have deprived Milk Producers and Consumers......
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow
citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual
endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE
as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph,
Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
Last week, Governor Mark Dayton selected Wilhelmina Wright to be the
next MN Supreme Court Justice. This will make her the first black female
Minnesota Supreme Court Justice. http://t.co/1FIG2InW
All
of the establishment and major media hailed the Governor’s selection of
Judge Wilhelmina Wright as the first black woman Minnesota Supreme
Court Justice; The Minneapolis Star Tribune indicated her work history
included being a Federal prosecutor, a Ramsey County Judge and a
Minnesota Appellate Court Judge.
Let this writer be among the first to congratulate Ms. Wilhelmina Wright for her accomplishment.
Unfortunately,
this writer takes exception to all the hoopla for this appointment when
the Minnesota Judiciary is systemically corrupt. Yes, advancement of
minorities is an important goal, but those litigants and defendants who
have been victimized by the systemically corrupt Minnesota Judicial
System, don’t really care about the skin color or the sex of the judge
that ignored the rule of law. (In anticipation of the standard
allegations of racism, this refers readers to Item 6 in http://bit.ly/OhjDwR “For those who have been duped into buying into racism, know that you have been played for chumps by the ruling class elite.”)
Yet,
despite the current systemic corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary, no
place in the article nor anywhere else, has this writer seen Governor
Mark Dayton referring to either honorability or integrity as being
primary considerations in making his selection.
SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION IN MINNESOTA JUDICIARY
Why has no one addressed the systemic corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary?
What’s that you say, Governor Dayton? You want to know, “What systemic Corruption?”
Please
excuse my faux paux. This writer forgot that our Minnesota Government
subscribes to the “Hear no evil, See No Evil, Speak no evil” philosophy
of Government. That is, if our government refuses to hear testimony and
see evidence of corruption, then corruption does not exist.
MINNESOTANS DENIED HEARING TO GIVE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION IN THE MINNESOTA JUDICIARY FOR COMING ON 8 YEARS
Since
2005, hundreds of Minnesotans have been asking for a hearing before the
Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees to give testimony and
evidence of corruption in the Minnesota State Judiciary. At first the
Republicans said they could do nothing because the Democrats were in the
majority. Therefore, Democrats got to appoint the Committee Chairs and
the Committee Chair’s had absolute control of the committee agenda.
But
in 2010, after the GOP was in the majority in the State Legislature,
Republicans became Chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.
Suddenly these same folks, who had previously said they supported
Judicial TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform), couldn’t find
the time to schedule a public hearing devoted to citizens giving
evidence and testimony of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary.
To
document some of the evidence and testimony of these hundreds of
Minnesotans, then Republican Representative Dan Severson hosted an “Ad
Hoc” hearing on Corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. Mind you, this
hearing was Ad Hoc, meaning it had not official standing with the
Legislature.
When the government refuses to allow you to exercise
your “First Amendment Right to Petition the Government for Redress of
Grievances without fear of punishment and reprisal”, you improvise.
People die, move or get worn out from the deliberate stonewalling and
duplicity of both Republicans and Democrats. The Judicial TAR folks
wanted to document testimony before any of these things happened to
potential witnesses that had already identified. You can see those
unofficial hearings from 2009 here http://bit.ly/ylWyAM and here http://bit.ly/r1DDao .
What’s that you say Governor Dayton? That’s still not enough proof of Systemic Corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary?
MINNESOTA LAWYERS NOT REQUIRED TO TREAT CLIENTS ETHICALLY
This
writer can think of no greater proof of the systemic corruption in the
Minnesota Judiciary than this: In the clandestine, unpublished ruling in
Fabian, May and Anderson v Volkommer MN A10-1205 the Minnesota Courts
ruled Minnesota Lawyer’s do not have to treat their clients ethically.
Even
though the Minnesota Judiciary considers WE THE PEOPLE uneducated
rubes, this writer is confident that rank and file Minnesotans.....
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please
join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens
our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of
restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our
Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration
of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.
*
Simulated
Litigation means the Court reaching a decision with the appearance that
it was done pursuant to the Rule of Law properly applied to the freely
admitted relevant facts in evidence and in accordance with the “proper
administration of justice”, but it was not. Most often this happens
with the Court or the “powers that be” “telegraph” to the attorneys of
the litigants the outcome they desire. The Court and the attorneys of
the litigants engage in some behavior, activities or agreement that
allows the Court to make the desired decision based facts in evidence.
However, the lawyers of the litigants control the Facts in Evidence on
the official Court record by engaging in “fact shaping”.
Fact
Shaping means when the Court and the lawyers of the Court control what
evidence get on the official record in a manner that will allow the
Court to make the courts “telegraphed” desired decision, rather than the
Court reaching its decision in accordance with the proper
administration of justice defined as the Rule of Law properly applied to
the nonmachinated, freely admitted relevant facts in evidence.
Telegraph
or Telegraphing means certain gestures and/or phrases used between the
Court and the Lawyers of Litigants to suggest a direction or course of
action, often in violation of the principles of the “proper
administration of justice” and the Rule of Law. Most often they are so
subtle and rely upon experience as a lawyer, that the actual “civilian”
litigant does not even perceive them.
**
Judicial Code
Red – Unwritten and denied rules of the Judiciary. Among these rules
are the rules that all Minnesota Judges retired in the time framer
required to allow the Governor to appoint there successor. Another Code
Red is the Rule that says Minnesota lawyers don’t run incumbent
Minnesota Judges. Failure of a lawyer or judge to follow the Judicial
Code Red rules is career limiting and may include other punishments.
Judicial Code Red and the Judicial Code Red Punishments are almost
always done in such a way as to be plausibly deniable as they are
contrary to the Rule of Law and the public policy of the
Constitutionally Limited, Representative Republic in which we live.
For those among you who are hardcore Republican or Democrat Loyalists and/or Uncle Tom political operatives (http://goo.gl/dd4bU ) , you can move along now. You saw what you wanted to see at the RNC:
Status Quo election year politics.
We’re Republicans Blah, Blah, Blah with Democratic Blah, Blah, Blah right on its heals
However, for those of you who fall into any of these following 3 categories, please read on:
1) Those Patriots who put loyalty to the 3 C’s (County, Constitution and fellow Citizens) before loyalty to party, please continue reading;
2) Those Patriots that feel an obligation to defend, protect and claw back the liberties and freedoms that others before us fought and died for;
3) Those Patriots who feel an obligation to restore and ensure for their children and future generations, the liberties and freedoms you have enjoyed during your life time;
4) Those who are not mindless sheep, cowering in fear of confrontation, going along to get along.
This analysis is not going to be the same old blah, blah, blah dished out by the two major parties and regurgitated by the major media. We are going to do some outside the box thinking and explore the internet for an uncensored and unscripted perception of reality held by average Americans.
In the course of this article, we are going to talk about 3 major points:
1) Disenfranchisement;
2) Illusion of “Business as usual”;
3) American Spring
1) DISENFRACHISEMENT
The major media touched on the issues of RNC rules changes. They attributed these to the Romney campaign. This writer believes the GOP Establishment had as much a hand in this rule change duplicity as did Candidate Romney. This author contends the GOP Establishment’s intent with these rule changes was to repress, suppress and oppress a chorus of voices that have risen within the Republican Party. A chorus of voices that challenge the corrupt, duplicitous status quo of the Republican Establishment (and Democrat Establishment)
This new chorus of voices is composed of Ron Paulers, the Liberty Movement and the TEA Party movement. These new voices have recognized the duplicity of the Republican Establishment and aim to “take back the party”. The Republican Establishment, quite predictably, likes the status quo and the power it has under the current status quo.
The TAR (Transparency, Accountability and Reform) that these various conservative groups espouse is challenging the status quo and the Power of the Republican Party elite. The GOP Establishment, therefore, is doing whatever it can to maintain their power and the status quo.
But these new conservative groups trying to squeeze into the Republican Tent, represent a major change and quandary fro the Republican Elite. In the past, the rank and file membership was more naïve, malleable and unorganized. The Republican Establishment was taken off guard and frightened by the prospect of an uncertain outcome to the convention. And the GOP Establishment determined it would not risk what it saw as “chaos” . The GOP elite would not allow these new voices demanding TAR a chance to speak, nominate their candidates and/or press their agenda. The GOP Elite determined it would avoid what it saw as potential chaos, by bypassing the troublesome delegates by changing the rules.
And in the angst of the moment the Republican Establishment and Candidate Romney made a huge mistake and missed an opportunity. The GOP Establishment’s first counter measures of “stealth” rule changes and pure “Might makes Right”, have led to distrust and reduced credibility from those within this new chorus of voices.
The machinations of Candidate Romney and the GOP Establishment have disenfranchised a large portion of TAR supporters and alerted other previously unaware conservatives, of the duplicity of the Republican Establishment.
Whoever was responsible, whether it was Candidate Romney or the Republican Establishment or both, failed to recognize the consequences of and the opportunity presented by a “messy”, un-orchestrated convention.
Through the chaos of free speech, free debate and free elections comes....
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]
This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.
